On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Neal Richter wrote: > I noticed that.. but what I did also notice is that I didn't see > that the mifluz code officially had copyright assigned to the > FSF.
He can't assign copyright to the FSF since it involves some code which is not his, least of all the Berkeley DB code which it uses. But it also includes a fair amount of "ht://Dig code" from the htlib/ directory. My understanding is that RMS didn't care much--it fills a need and it's mostly under the GPL. > My main motivation is a library style release of htdig could have > a LGPL and not compromize the spirit of the project. Sure. We'll see what happens. I'd be interested in any legal opinion about the "ht://Dig Group" issue since there's currently no obvious "owner" of all of the ht://Dig code. -- -Geoff Hutchison Williams Students Online http://wso.williams.edu/ _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
