On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Brian White wrote: > Ok - my desire to get it into 3.1.x is based around the fact that > we have installed 3.1.6 at a large client site, with the AdjustableLogging > patch installed. In fact, it was written for their installation. > It makes long term support slightly easier if the product is *fully* off the > shelf.
No offense, but there are a variety of packaging mechanisms which will also add a patch (.rpm, .deb, etc.) for various local modifications. I also would agree with Gilles that your patch seems like a rather large feature to be adding when we really want to "finish" 3.1.x releases. > However, that said - getting it into the 3.2 CVS tree means by the > time it ever becomes a genuine issue, a stable 3.2 release should > be available for use. I would be happy with that. OK, then let's talk about getting your patch into the 3.2.0b4 snapshots. If we get it in shortly, we'll probably have a beta release or two to catch any portability problems. -- -Geoff Hutchison Williams Students Online http://wso.williams.edu/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
