Gabriele Bartolini wrote: > thanks for pointing to the cookies patch. Yes, it is a > backporting patch from 3.2.x and works pretty well on my > Linux system. I expect other people on different platforms > to test it and give me some feedback regarding portability.
I gave it a try just yesterday night. The VMS C++ compiler was unhappy about these things (from memory, as I develop at home, but read the list at work - sorry): - It didn't like the std::cout default assignments. I removed "std" and it was okay. Obviously it's not using the std namespace. - There's an inline declaration without a definition (HtSetDate?) I moved the procedure body into the header file. - Httimegm is not defined / timegm.c is missing. As it hadn't occured to me that this is a backport, I did't yet look into the 3.2.x distribution. - It complains about a missing constructor String(char *). This is just a missing #include "htString.h". - I still have to look into the #ifdef _LIBC sections. Compaq C is probably sufficiently POSIX but uses a different macro. Besides that, everything looks good. Thanks a lot. cu, Martin -- So long, and thanks | Martin Vorlaender | VMS & WNT programmer for all the books... | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In Memoriam Douglas Adams | http://www.pdv-systeme.de/users/martinv/ 1952-2001 | home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
