Hi,

I just heard from one of the developers of libtool, Peter O'Gorman, who has been doing a lot of fixing to get libtool to work properly with OS X. In short, his input was: use version 1.5 of libtool. Judging by the number of changes to libtool that deal specifically with darwin (OS X) related issues, I'd say this is a promising path to follow. Peter is trying to build htdig from the most recent snapshots with libtool 1.5 and will get back to me with the results.

Peter also said that you can tell what version of libtool we are using by looking "at the configure line". Specifically, he says: "Your developer can easily check if he is using libtool-1.5 by looking at the configure line:
checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all (on 1.5) and
file_magic Mach-O dynamically linked shared library ( anything other than 1.5)"


A quick search of the htdig source would indicate that we are using a pre-1.5 version of libtool.

I hope this helps.

Ted Stresen-Reuter

On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 05:29 AM, Lachlan Andrew wrote:

Greetings Gabriele,

I wasn't running any of the other tools.  I just thought that, being
the last step in the process you recommended, running  autoreconf  by
itself should give the same files back.  When I run it twice in a
row, it gives the the same  configure  file each time, but that file
is different from the one in CVS.  Does that mean you didn't run
autoreconf  when you updated the files three months ago?

Lachlan

On Mon, 19 May 2003 21:44, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
Il lun, 2003-05-19 alle 12:41, Lachlan Andrew ha scritto:
Am I right in thinking that running
    autoreconf
twice in the last step should make no difference?  When I run
autoreconf (from Autoconf 2.57) the  configure  file is very
different from the one in CVS.

However, are u sure you did not change the config.sub and config.guess files? What about aclocal.m4?

So ... try to run the other tools separately. Which versions are
you using of autoconf (2.57, right?), automake and libtool?



------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev

Reply via email to