Greetings Neal, On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:35, Neal Richter wrote:
> Do you know for certain that the environment is the same? Isn't that the meaning of passing the DB_ENV argument to CDB_db_create()? I'm not sure how else to make two databases share an environment. > It would be nice if I could duplicate this bug, but I've never been > able to. As Geoff pointed out recently, anyone with a sourceforce account can get a compile farm account. That has a mac which had the problem. See <http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=762&group_id=1>. > This smells like something that should be handled in the WordDB > class at the DB API level. Hmm... Perhaps, but the original aim of the compression was to make it transparent. Since it creates its own database, that seems to me to be the place to fix things. I agree that totally disabling the environment is a bit drastic. It should be possible to create a new environment containing *only* the weak compression database, but with all "shared" fields (other than the memory pool) copied from the environment of the main database's environment. How would that sound? Regarding implementing a separate cache, that is certainly possible, but it has the disadvantage of duplicating existing code. (I'm a big fan of avoiding code bloat.) Cheers, Lachlan -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht://Dig developer DownUnder (http://www.htdig.org) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ htdig-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
