According to Gabriele Bartolini: > >I vote that, once the Windows db.words.db bug is ironed out, we > >release 3.2.0b5 / 3.2.0rc1. If anyone has a reason *not* to, could > >they please mail it to the group? > > I vote +1. > > I guess the actual snapshot is the best 3.2 version so far. So ... better a > 3.2.0b5 than a buggy 3.2.0b3 still around ...
I'd agree! Lachlan & Neal, you'd probably know better than anyone whether the code is ready for a beta release, as you've done most of the work on it in the past several months. If you say it's ready, then I say go for it. +1 As for who holds the keys, it's really up to the developers as a group to decide on these matters. Beyond that, the only holding of the keys there's been is that Geoff has personally put the finishing touches on each release since 3.1.0b1, so he knows best the ins and outs of how it's done. If any of you want to take that over, just say the word, and I'm sure Geoff would share with you his procedures, scripts, checklists, etc. (It would be good to have all that on the developer web site for posterity in any case, don't you think?) -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/ Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
