On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Lachlan Andrew wrote: > Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:25:52 +1000 > From: Lachlan Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [htdig-dev] difficulty profiling > > Greetings all, > > I've been trying to profile htdig, but getting nonsense results. > > If 'time' reports that htdig runs for 1 minute of CPU time, gprof > reports that it ran for 3 seconds, and doesn't report any of the > symbols in files in the db/ directory. I've tried both -p and > -pg, but they give the same odd output. > > If anyone can profile properly, could you please mail me a profile? > > Thanks, > Lachlan
Hi Lachlan, I compiled htdig-3.2.0b5 with -pg; the following patches applied: DESTDIR.0 TMPFILE.0 extension_filter.0 fileSpace.0 operator[].0 and robots.0 I ran htdig on ~13k documents; it ran about 40% slower than my regular htdig, (without -pg). I ran gprof htdig > htdig.gmon;gzip htdig.gmon, and put the profile on the patch site, although it's not a patch;) ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.2.0b5/htdig.gmon.gz Hope it can help in improving htdig performance. Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
