At 10:59 PM -0600 3/23/01, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
>What do you consider "good" vs. "bad" characters? Remember that most of
>us have little or no XML experience, so you need to define your terms
>if we're to understand each other.
Sorry, I didn't realize his response was only to me--it's been a busy
week. A "bad character" was evidently a high-bit character--something
above 7-bit ASCII.
I haven't the faintest idea why this would choke an XML parser
considering SGML-encoding is defined for most Unicode character sets.
>Are there others that should get similar treatment, or is this
>another matter altogether?
It may be an issue that the high-bit characters in 3.1 aren't
re-encoded into SGML equivalents in htsearch. But I still don't see
why this is causing grief for an XML parser.
--
--
-Geoff Hutchison
Williams Students Online
http://wso.williams.edu/
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a
subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
