On Tue, 1 May 2001, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 17:44:59 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Gilles Detillieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: "ht://Dig mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [htdig] Segfault on url_rewrite_rules
>
> According to Joe R. Jah:
> > On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> > > Have you been able to make any progress on getting the rx functions to
> > > work on your system?
> >
> > Hi Gilles,
> >
> > I finally licked that problem once and for all;) I upgraded a new box
> > from BSDi 4.0.1 to 4.1, and them to 4.2;)
> >
> > htdig 3.1.5 compiles without any modification of the code; with all the
> > patches save one. Your last patch ExternalParser.2 compiled on 4.0.1 (gcc
> > 2.7.2), on 4.1 (gcc 2.91), but on 4.2 (gcc 2.95.2) it gives the following
> > error message:
> > ______________________________________________________________________________
> > ExternalParser.cc: In method `void ExternalParser::parse(Retriever &, URL &)':
> > ExternalParser.cc:519: implicit declaration of function `int wait(...)'
> > ______________________________________________________________________________
>
> I mention this possibility, and what to do about it, in the notes above
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> the patch's diff listing. In 3.2 the configure script checks for this
> and defines the appropriate macro for the wait.h file to be included.
> I haven't figured out yet how to retrofit this test in 3.1.x. I knew
> it once, but I've forgotten now.
I haven't been able to do what you have prescribed, manually define
HAVE_WAIT_H or HAVE_SYS_WAIT_H. Would you be so kind in describing the
procedure?
Regards,
Joe
--
_/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o
_/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_
_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_)
_/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a
subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
