Reporting back:
I had a gcc includes and libs problem. An old version of gcc includes
existed in /usr/local/include/g++ alongside the new one in g++-3
Removing all the gcc installations old and new and reinstalling the new
one followed by a clean rebuild of htdig fixed the compile problem.
Both 3.1.5 and 3.2.0b3 compile no problem, but see my post (tacked on
to the core dump thread - sorry but it seemed appropriate) about core
dumps with 3.2.0b3.
Anyway, 3.1.5 is working beautifully.
Many thanks for your help Geoff.
Brian
Brian S. Craigie wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I will try the 3.1.5 you suggest.
>
> The gcc I got was all pre-built and should have included everything,
> but I shall get the gcc source and make it myself , try it with
> 3.2.0b3 and report back.
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Brian
>
> Geoff Hutchison wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Brian S. Craigie wrote:
>>
>>> I am having problems compiling both htdig 3.1.2 and beta (3.2.0b3)
>>> on Solaris 8 (sparc) with gcc 2.95.3 (the latest non-beta gcc)
>>>
>>
>> First off, I wouldn't use 3.1.2. Period. See
>> <http://www.htdig.org/RELEASE.html> for release notes. Get 3.1.5
>> now--previous versions of the 3.1 releases have a fairly serious
>> security
>> hole.
>>
>> You don't mention what problems you're having with the 3.1 releases, but
>> from the messages with the 3.2.0b3 code, it looks like the compiler
>> doesn't like the libio headers--I'm assuming you installed the libraries
>> for that particular compiler release? Did you install these from
>> binaries
>> too?
>>
>> (I've never had problems with a compiler that I've bootstrapped and
>> installed myself.)
>>
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a
subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
