On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:41:16 -0600 (CST)
> From: Gilles Detillieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Joe R. Jah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [htdig] how long does it take to index?
>
> If you didn't find any difference, it would likely be because very few of
> the files you're digging have a ".shtml" suffix. Either that, or you're
> indexing a very fast HTTP server so the request time is negligeable.
> The only way to be sure the change is having any effect is to run htdig
> with -vv and look at the debugging output to see whether it tries and
> finds a local file. htdig/Document.cc is the only file that needs to be
> patched.
Thanks; I'll try a run with -vv.
> Of course it would be possible to make htdig configurable as far as
> what suffixes it allows for local_urls, but that just reopens the whole
> issue of how is the best way to do this. Probably using a mime.types
> file is the way to go, but someone would have to add this capability
> to the code. It's not enough to just give htdig a list of suffxes to
> allow - you need to tell it what content-type is associated with each
> suffix.
How does 3.2x deal with file://? I guess local_urls is irrelevant there.
Regards,
Joe
--
_/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o
_/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_
_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_)
_/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a
subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
