Hi, > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Geoff > Hutchison > Enviado el: jueves, 03 de enero de 2002 6:29 > Para: Jamie Anstice > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: [htdig] new year's thoughts > > At 1:12 PM +1300 1/3/02, Jamie Anstice wrote: > >phrase searching where if the phrase being queried contains a > >stop-word then it doesn't match even when there's a match in the > >database. > > Yeah, this is a known bug. The fix isn't as bad as you make it out to > be if you allow for false positive matches. You do the query, keeping > track of the word offsets in the phrase query itself. So "Foo and Bar > Esquire" would search for Bar as +2 and Esquire as +3 relative to > Foo. Some cases will match with some other word replacing the "and," > but you certainly won't miss any. >
Hmm. htdig doesn't index like that right now. Wouldn't it be easier to *remove* stop-words from the query? This is relatively easy to do with the new parser (I haven't checked the old one :), and would give similar results. BTW, having some result template variable containing ignored query words would by really nice. -- Quim _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
