Earlier I wrote... > Yeah, it gets a little tiresome hearing the same old ill-founded plea > for mucking up a Reply-To header for the benefit of those who'd rather > not think before replying. There are very good reasons for not putting > in this header, which have been discussed before. > > See http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > and http://www.htdig.org/mail/2000/07/0303.html
In the interest of truncating any further debate on what I now believe to be a moot point, please also see http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6693&group_id=1 So, without SourceForge's blessing, even if a majority of htdig-general subscribers wanted Reply-To munging anyway, we'd need to find a new place to host the mailing list. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/ Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
