According to Geoff Hutchison:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Andreas Jobs wrote:
> > Most of the files are dated "Jan 21 2002" and earlier. Only the Makefile.in,
> >   configure and a few(4) other are dated "Jul 21 2002".
> > The snapshot i take was htdig-3.2.0b4-20020721.tar.gz
> 
> I'm assuming that you're asking why so few files have changed recently in
> the snapshots? There are a few reasons:
> 1) Several projects are in development outside of the main CVS
> 2) The number of active developers has gone down considerably since last
> year
>  
>  (HINT! This means if you have even a small amount of time to contribute,
>   you can make a big impact!)
> 
> 3) Some development is "logjammed" until some of the major projects in
> (1) are finished. For example, the merge with the current mifluz code may
> break code fixes in indexing, etc.
> 
> So it's not surprising or incorrect that few files have changed since
> January.
> 
> Remember--this is open software and anyone can help! The more help, the
> faster development will go.

Well, not that I disagree with any of the above, but the fact is that
this snapshot doesn't have ANY of the changes made since the htdig-3-2-x
branch was folded into the main htdig CVS tree.  So, it would seem
that your snapshot script has gone back to grabbing the now-stangnant
htdig-3-2-x branch of the tree, for whatever reason.

-- 
Gilles R. Detillieux              E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre       WWW:    http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba  Winnipeg, MB  R3E 3J7  (Canada)


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
_______________________________________________
htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a 
subject of unsubscribe
FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html

Reply via email to