On Tuesday 18 February 2003 14:08, Jim Cole wrote: > On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 06:43 PM, Adam Brown wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion however if you look at the 'title' meta tag > > for the > > page you will see that the word "womans" is used without an apostrophe > > and > > this instance is being indexed as "woman". It's got me stumped. Can > > someone > > point me to the correct location in the source where I can check what > > is > > going on. > > Not sure what is going on, but I guess we are looking at different > things. Neither the page you mentioned in a previous message nor what I > assume to be the corresponding output you sent earlier today includes > any occurrence of the word "womans". At least not as of five minutes > ago. > > I tried adding the meta lines from your page to a file on my machine > and then indexing the file. If I add the word "womans" to the meta > element, it shows up as "womans" in the word database. Also, "woman's" > ends up in the database as "woman" and "womans". Likewise "women's" > ends up as "women" and "womens". I don't think anything is wrong with > the code itself. > > If you want to confirm the URL for the page you are currently working > with, I would be happy to dig it from here and compare notes with you. > > Jim
Hi Jim, Thanks for your efforts. As I was pasting the excerpts to send you I realised that my html source viewer wasn't picking up a hidden character after the word "woman". This is what was confusing me. Your original theory is correct, this character is causing the problem. I should be able to take it fom here. Cheers, Adam ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
