On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 13:19, Jim Cole wrote: > On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 09:05 AM, Kevin Breit wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 01:01, Jim Cole wrote: > >> On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 01:45 PM, Kevin Breit wrote: > >> > >>> I am indexing using ht://dig (whatever is on RH8) using a custom conf > >> > >> For various reasons, you might be better off running something other > >> than what Red Hat provides. For a production server, you should > >> probably drop back to 3.1.6. If you want (or need) some 3.2 beta > >> functionality, a recent snapshot might be a better choice. > > > > *sigh* As a matter of fact, we're running RH9. Does this make a > > difference? > > I believe Red Hat 9 has a somewhat more recent 3.2 beta snapshot. Since > it is a development snapshot, it is hard to say whether this is a good > thing or not; sort of depends on the day they grabbed the snapshot. The > only version that is currently recommended for production is 3.1.6. Use > of the 3.2 series is generally only recommended for cases where new > functionality is required (e.g. phrase searching) or people are > interested in helping with testing/debugging.
Is phrase searching the same as multiple word searches? Kevin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ htdig-general mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a subject of unsubscribe FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
