According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I just tried setting date_factor to give more recent pages more weight. I
> found that the top-returned documents are from way in the future (e.g.
> 12-12-2005). When I look at the file properties, they were all
> 12-12-2003, which is when the file was created. I looked in the metadata,
> the DC.Date.Created, DC.Date.Issued, DC.Date.Modified were all also
> 12-12-2003. However the DC.Date.Review metadata is 12-12-2005, so I'm
> guessing that is what htdig is using for date_factor. Is this an htdig
> bug? Can I get around this problem somehow?
D'oh! It's a bug alright! You don't say which version of htdig you're
running, so I can't provide a patch for you, but I think the fix should
be just a matter of finding the following lines in htdig/HTML.cc:
else if (metadatetags.CompareWord(cache) &&
config->Boolean("use_doc_date",0))
and changing them to this:
else if (metadatetags.CompareWord(cache, which, length) &&
cache[length] == '\0' &&
config->Boolean("use_doc_date",0))
This is around line 846 in 3.2.0b5, or line 802 in 3.1.6 (which has a
couple other bugs related to meta date handling - see Date-viewing.0
and metadate.0 in ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.1.6/).
--
Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig general mailing list: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ht://Dig FAQ: http://htdig.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-general
