On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Geoff Hutchison wrote:

> At 3:44 AM -0500 2/7/00, Bernard T. Higonnet wrote:
> >I am unable to do a boolean search the definition of which is "not
> >searchterm"
> >
> >It seems to me this is a perfectly reasonable request.
> 
> Currently, the meaning of the boolean "not" is something along the 
> lines of a "not and."
> 
> It's a feature that's been requested before, but seems to have ended 
> up on the bottom of the pile. Contributions, of course, are welcome.

You can immitate it a little, it's not fail proof, by doing a search
for

  <a-very-very-very-common-word> not <searchterm>

this is allmost like

        TRUE                     not <searchterm>

which is

                                 not <searchterm>


--jesse
--------------------------------------------------------------------
J. op den Brouw                           Johanna Westerdijkplein 75
Haagse Hogeschool                                  2521 EN  DEN HAAG
Sector Techniek                                          Netherlands
Afdeling Elektrotechniek                              +31 70 4458936
-------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------

Linux - because reboots are for hardware changes


------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.

Reply via email to