Geoff Hutchison wrote:
>
> >How about single quotes? Haven't tried this myself with htdig, but it's
> >a standard procedure working with JavaScript:
> >
> ><META NAME="description" CONTENT="<img
> >src='http://www.image.location.gif'>">
>
> I don't believe it to be valid to have a new tag within a META tag.
>
> I actually don't think it's strictly valid to have a tag within *any* tag,
> but I could be wrong on that count.
>
> So <foo name="< is bad, right from there--you shouldn't have a new "<"
> before the other tag ends. At least that's my recollection of the standards.
>
> -Geoff
You're right. The second < should be a <
Here's an excerpt from
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/global.html#h-7.4.4.2
> Note. When a property specified by a META element takes a value that is a
> URI, some authors prefer to specify the meta data
> via the LINK element. Thus, the following meta data declaration:
>
> <META name="DC.identifier"
> content="ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1866.txt">
>
> might also be written:
>
> <LINK rel="DC.identifier"
> type="text/plain"
> href="ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1866.txt">
Maybe you could hack up htdig to support the LINK tag?
/Palle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word "unsubscribe" in
the body of the message.
