On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Joshua Gerth wrote:
> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 13:38:29 -0800 (PST)
> From: Joshua Gerth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [htdig] ssl Patch for htdig
>
>
> Speaking of ssl patches. I also downloaded 3.1.5 and patched it with the
> ssl.0 patch and the -l flag. However, I then ran into the additional
> problem that urls of the form:
> https://myserver.com
>
> were being directed to port 80, and that only urls of the form:
> https://myserver.com:433
>
> were actually going to the encrypted port. So I hacked my copy so that
> any url which starts with
> https
>
> goes to port 433 by default but 'http' still goes to 80 by default. Of
> course, both can still be overridden by using the :port on the url.
>
> Did anyone else hit this? Would this patch be useful to anyone? If so
> I'll try to post it assuming I have the rights to do so.
I only tested to see if the patch applies to a clean 3.1.5. I am sure,
however, that your patch will be useful to someone;) Go ahead an post it
to the list, or just upload it to:
ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/incoming/
P.S. It would be nice to document your patch; save potential users the
guesswork and digging up relevant information in the list archives;)
Regards,
Joe
--
_/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o
_/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_
_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_)
_/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
List archives: <http://www.htdig.org/mail/menu.html>
FAQ: <http://www.htdig.org/FAQ.html>
