On Monday 12 November 2007 12:17:43 Carl Franks wrote: > On 10/11/2007, Mario Minati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 10 November 2007 20:24:36 Carl Franks wrote: > > > I don't envisage any of the work I'm doing being released in > > > DBIx-Class-HTML-FormFu. > > > > You mean within the next few weeks, right? > > No :) > To remove confusion, I've done what I should have done earlier - I've > copied the recent changes to a new directory - > "branches/HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC" - and reverted > trunk/DBIx-Class-HTML-FormFu back to revision 550 - before I removed > the prefix/suffix feature.
Boy I was struggling with all these changes ;-) > DBIx-Class-HTML-FormFu should be considered deprecated, but won't be > documented as such until HTML-FormFu-Model-DIBC is actually released. Since I make heavily use of nested_base and nested_name in my app I made a local copy of DBIx-Class-HTML-FormFu rev. 584, which is working fine for me. Greets, Mario _______________________________________________ HTML-FormFu mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
