On 12/02/2008, Carl Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe something more along the line of Roles would be better?
> so in your config you could do something like:
> roles: ['Catalyst::StashUserID']
> which would load the relevant class, and do the dirty work.
The more I think about this, the more I like the idea.
I'll stick to calling it Plugins, though, as I'm probably abusing the
term 'roles'.
I think this could be implemented using the same code as constraints, etc.
and use the same syntax.
---
plugins:
- 'Catalyst::StashUserID'
- type: SomeOtherPlugin
some: options
I imagine allowing the plugins to have hooks into various stages, such
as process, post_process, render, etc.
And possibly allow for plugins to be attached to a single element, as
well as to the form.
This would allow for Catalyst-specific behaviour, and keep it
restricted to a Catalyst* namespace.
I think I'd probably also move some functionality that I've recently
added, into plugins instead - to keep the core a little cleaner.
Carl
_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
