Hi Moritz,
I need transactions for my catalystx::controller::extjs::rest derived
classes, so I have no control over the line that calls update.
And I thought it would be me more usefull to put the code into
model::dbic than into extjs::rest.
Greets,
Mario
Moritz Onken schrieb:
Hi Mario,
as far as I remember nested transactions result in a noop. Which means
you can nest transactions and nothing bad will happen.
Other than that: what's wrong with $schema->txn_do {
$form->model->update } ?
cheers,
moritz
Am 02.09.2009 um 14:10 schrieb Mario Minati:
Hi @all,
I need to use transactions for all my db update and create actions.
Currently FF:M:DBIC doesn't support this. I'd like to extend the
update method to start a transaction, if an attribute is defined
(e.g. 'use_transaction').
To avoid nested transactions, as update is also called internally, I
would introduce a class variable which stores our transaction state.
Do you agree with that?
Greets,
Mario
_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
