Thanks Carl,

I see your point and with the way you can specify external modules (using '+' notation) it would be no problem keeping my own an external FormFu specific name space .. which I might start...

thanks for looking,
-Ben





On 05/07/10 13:59, Carl Franks wrote:
Hi Ben,

I can't see any problems with this.
Because it's database-specific, I think I'd prefer it released as a
stand-alone distribution, rather than core.

I already think FormFu's core is rather bloated, and anyone using
HTML::FormFu::Preload has to pay a RAM cost for every new module
that's included in core.

Carl


On 1 July 2010 11:23, Benjamin Martin<benja...@opusvl.com>  wrote:
.. an updated version that work better... have changed 'months' to 'mons'
etc. ... works better with DateTime::Format::Pg this way.

cheers,
-Ben

On 25/06/10 14:19, Carl Franks wrote:
On 25 June 2010 12:29, Benjamin Martin<benja...@opusvl.com>    wrote:

Hello,

I have produced a new element and wondered what as the best way to put it
up
for review and possible inclusion it the HTML::FormFu set of modules??

The new element is intended to represent a Postgres Interval and was made
by
coping the Date.pm and altering it.

Hi Ben,

Just attach the .pm file to an email to the list, and we'll give you
feedback.

Thanks,
Carl

_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu






_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu

_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu



_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu

Reply via email to