I don't know if you're interested in this snippet from the london.pm mailing list...
:) Chiz ----- Forwarded message from Dave Cross ----- Subject: Re: webmail Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:39:15 +0000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:58:07AM +0000, Chisel Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:32:19AM +0000, Dave Cross wrote: > > Depends what you're doing I guess. At least half of what I do with > > templates has nothing at all to do with generating HTML so it makes > > no sense to use a templating system that is tied to producing HTML. > > I guess the name is misleading. > I've used H::T for templating in general. > > I guess HTML was what it was originally intended to template, but it's > not tied to it. Module naming is very important. I wonder how many other people have been put off using HTML::Template because they aren't building HTML with their templates? Perhaps you could suggest a name change to the author. Maybe something like Not::Just::HTML::Template. Dave... -- Drugs are just bad m'kay ----- End forwarded message ----- -- e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Hey, this is my sig, if you don't like w: www.herlpacker.co.uk | it, STOP READING MY EMAILS! gpg: D167E7FE | ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Html-template-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
