Sam Tregar writes:
>On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, William R Ward wrote:
>
>> Previously it was OK to have a missing include file.  I just upgreaded
>> to a new version of HTML::Template, and now my templates don't work
>> anymore.  I relied heavily on the behavior of missing include files
>> not generating errors.  Now I have to go create a bunch of empty
>> include files.. :-(
>
>Really?  Which version of HTML::Template allowed missing tmpl_includes?  I
>don't think this was an intentional change.

Sorry this is an ancient thread... but I'm cleaning out my mailbox...

It looks like this was a patch I had made and forgot about.  I found a
workaround months ago that doesn't require the patch, but I still
think it might be a useful thing to have as an option.

--Bill.

-- 
William R Ward            [EMAIL PROTECTED]          http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by
 little statesmen and philosophers and divines."        - Emerson


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Html-template-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users

Reply via email to