On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:52:23AM -0400, Chris Reinhardt wrote:
> eval { ...code that dies... };
> if ($@) {
> # There was an error in the eval {}
> }
I've always been uncomfortable using eval().
I know /how/ to use it, but it just feels dirty.
What are the negative effects (if any) of using eval()?
I'm curious why the call to H::T->new() has to die, and not just return undef..
I'd love to be able to do something along the lines of:
my $ht = HTML::Template->new(...)
or my_error_handling_routine(...);
instead of:
eval (
$ht = HTML::Template->new(...);
);
Chisel
--
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | They asked how many employees we had,
w: www.herlpacker.co.uk | broken down by sex. Told them drugs
gpg: D167E7FE | and alcohol was more of a problem.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Html-template-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
