Karen J. Cravens wrote:

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Puneet Kishor wrote:

PK>well, now that you put it that way, I feel I might be the one who is not
PK>really understanding what you all are saying, and hence, am perhaps
PK>barking tangentially ;-).

I think it's just a matter of different approaches.

The way I've been doing it, as I described earlier, the content was in a
template. It relied on includes to pull the HTML in,

wow! cool... instead of putting the dog in the kennel, you are putting the kennel around the dog.


That said, H::T (I believe) sets out to solve the problem of putting the dog in the kennel. The criticism is not at all of other approaches... who am I to do that. The question is whether H::T should be changed to accommodate putting the kennel around the dog. I believe that would deviate from its goal, and perhaps complicate it and weigh it down. imho.

Anyway, thanks for a great discussion.

;-)




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Html-template-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users

Reply via email to