On Mon, 3 May 2004, Mark Fuller wrote: MF>It seems to me the latter would be more efficient? If I am already testing MF>my criteria for selected, then I don't have to do an "if" again in the HTML. MF>In other words, is it more efficient to resolve the variable contents, or to MF>test variable?
The main thing the TMPL_IF offers is the choice for the template writer to change the format. If you hardcode it to "SELECTED" you're requiring a selection box, vs. radio buttons (which use "CHECKED"). (Well, technically if you leave the non-selected ones blank you *could* still use it in a TMPL_IF, but that's a bit risky...) -- Karen J. Cravens [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ Html-template-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
