On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:08:25AM -0500, Timm Murray wrote:
> At 09:01 AM 6/2/04 -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> <>
> >Spider your content instead. Does htdig have anything like
> ><!-- noindex --> ?
>
> We discussed spidering and my boss is against the idea. I personally would
> prefer not to do it if we can get away with it.
Can you explain why? I'm just curious why spidering would not be ok, but scanning the file system would be.
Extra work on the server itself. Scanning the file system is easier on the system than making a request to Apache, even on localhost. I don't think either solution is particularly difficult to implement, but scanning the content files directly also lets us have an easier time analyzing the structure of the document. In the case I'm suggesting using, the content files would be re-processed by HTML::Template for any TMPL_INCLUDE tags (however, not much has been created under this system besides some examples, so now is a good time to make incompatible changes if need be).
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Html-template-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
