On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Chisel Wright wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:56:08PM -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:Also it seems to be MySQL specific. Did I read that wrong?
Nope, you got that right too.
Out of interest, why MySQL? I know that lack of Postgres support is one reason that we didn't consider Krang recently when looking for a content management system recently.
Really? Can you explain why MySQL vs. Postgres was a deal-breaker? And out of curiosity, what were the other reasons? Since noone chooses a CMS lightly (it really is a long-term decision), I'd really love to know. Besides, we're always looking for ways to improve Krang!
Not trying to start a flame-war. Were there technical reasons, or was it a "I have time to make it work well with on database" thing?
Phew. And to quell any thoughts in the wings, yes, you can work on Krang in both emacs and vi. Or any other editor for that matter (yes, nano folks too!).
Simply put, we started developing Krang to serve our own needs, and MySQL fit our needs better than Postgres did. We open-sourced it as a way to give back to the community, and if people want support for other DB's, they're welcome to contribute. :)
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Html-template-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/html-template-users
