Sometime on May 24, Sam Tregar assembled some asciibets to say: > > Yeah, that's what I've been thinking of, but if Function Objects exist > > in java, then that's a possibility too. > > Heh. I highly doubt that. In the church of pure objects there is only > one true object type. There might be a standard interface like "Filter" > or something. But I guarantee there's no special object type for > functions! In fact, if you want to get technical, Java doesn't even have
Hmm, just thought if C++ goes out of its way to provide funtion objects when function pointers are still legal, maybe java would too. So, a filter interface it probably will be then. -- Always draw your curves, then plot your reading. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
