>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>>>> On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 16:52:20 -0400 (EDT),
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Sam> On 1 Jun 2002, Pekka Marjola wrote:
>> Great! Then I won't make a workaround for the bug. JIT is almost
>> compulsory for very large parameter hashes (hundreds of values), since
>> performance of standradt H:T degrades rather fast.

Sam> It's funny you should say that. I consider HTML::Template::JIT to
Sam> be mostly a novelty module. I've never seen a situation where
Sam> HTML::Template was the bottle-neck in a web application and I've
Sam> programmed many systems that use hundreds of parameter values. 
Sam> Are you sure the problem is HTML::Template?

Hmm. I'll have to check out, though from the log the increase in speed
seemed to be quite much. However, I noticed some other time-consuming
items, too. I'll maili more details if I still have to use JIT.

-- 
This space is intentionally left blank.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to