I've been looking at your code trying to follow things, but have also found the Coyote API quite difficult to digest. Sounds like you have a pretty good idea of how to proceed though. Have you been in contact with any of the other connector implementors for assistance? I don't know how much they'd be able to help but it might be worth a try.
Mike On 8/6/05, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike et al, > > Tomcat Coyote API proved much more intrusive as I initially assumed and > felt it would need to be. So, my initial attempt to keep Tomcat Coyote > specific code separate from the rest of the connector behind an abstract > API has failed miserably. I did take me quite a while to wrap my head > around Coyote API. Tomcat's logical layers appear much more tightly > coupled that I thought it would be necessary. So, I'll have to scrap the > existing architecture and get back to the drawing board. > > Besides, I have come to realize that HttpCommon needs a better framework > to manage HTTP expectations (such as 'expect: 100-continue' handshake), > which has been the only positive outcome of this endeavor so far. > > I'll keep you posted on the progress or lack thereof > > Oleg > > On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 15:50 -0400, Michael Becke wrote: > > Hi Oleg, > > > > I wouldn't mind taking a look at what you're working on. If you get > > the chance please post the code somewhere and I'll take a quick look. > > Who knows, maybe I'll even get a chance to add something :) > > > > Mike > > > > On 7/24/05, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > Just to keep you in the loop, this weekend I started working on a Tomcat > > > Coyote connector based on HttpCommon code in order to test how well (or > > > badly) HttpCommon components fare on the server side. If any of you care > > > to monitor the development or interested in taking part in it, please > > > let me know. Otherwise, I'll be working off the private repository and > > > will not be committing any code to the Jakarta HttpClient SVN repository > > > until the connector's architecture is more or less complete and I have a > > > fair degree of confidence in its viability. > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
