DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36604>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36604 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-12 11:08 ------- (In reply to comment #2) +1 I like clean patterns. (In reply to comment #3) > In my opinion such a change would constitute an API change [...] Humm, at least the "Java" API doesn't change by the name refactoring. You still use the public instances HEADER_WIRE and CONTENT_WIRE. Thus, it won't lead into compile problems. It is "Logging" API(?) change, though - but it'll produce in most cases a "deprecated" line in the logging configuration (file) only, which doesn't "hurt". I mean, when shipping a product that uses HttpClient, you normally have the both lines like: log4j.logger.org.apache.commons.httpclient WARN log4j.logger.httpclient WARN The first will take over; the second is "ignored" and should be replaced by: log4j.logger.org.apache.commons.httpclient.Wire WARN Cheers, Christian -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
