DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36604>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36604





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-12 11:08 -------
(In reply to comment #2)

+1

I like clean patterns.

(In reply to comment #3)
> In my opinion such a change would constitute an API change [...]

Humm, at least the "Java" API doesn't change by the name refactoring. You still
use the public instances HEADER_WIRE and CONTENT_WIRE. Thus, it won't lead into
compile problems.

It is "Logging" API(?) change, though - but it'll produce in most cases a
"deprecated" line in the logging configuration (file) only, which doesn't
"hurt". I mean, when shipping a product that uses HttpClient, you normally have
the both lines like:

  log4j.logger.org.apache.commons.httpclient WARN
  log4j.logger.httpclient WARN

The first will take over; the second is "ignored" and should be replaced by:

  log4j.logger.org.apache.commons.httpclient.Wire WARN

Cheers,
Christian

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to