Ortwin Gl�ck <ortwin.glueck 'at' nose.ch> writes: > Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > If I'm correct, this makes HttpClient users unable to be more > > than "conditionally compliant" with the HTTP specifications. To > > be fully compliant, one must (e.g. SHOULD is used in RFC) not > > refer anymore to a permanently moved resource (301), which is not > > the case with a temporarily moved resource (302), and there is no > > way to distinguish between these two cases using your proposed > > technique. > > Yes, I am afraid this is true. Please feel free to add a RFE to the > issue tracking system.
If you think this can save you some time, I can do that. Just note that I have never used 3.x myself yet. -- Guillaume Cottenceau --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
