DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34048>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Connection reuse with custom|Connection reuse with custom |HostConfiguration |HostConfiguration ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 23:18 ------- Mike is probably the ultimate authority on this issue. Here's my opinion for what it is worth. (1) I do not like the idea of HttpConnection keeping a reference to HostConfiguration, as HostConfiguration is a mutable object that may change without HttpConnection knowing about it. This may *potentially* lead to all sorts of nasty (and unexpected) problems. (2) The case (at least to me) does not appear generic enough to warrant inclusion into the stock version of HttpClient. I do not have the specific details of your applications, but based on details you have provided I tend to think that a custom connection manager seems like a more appropriate way to achieve the desired goal instead of patching HttpClient (3) One does not necessarily need to subclass HostConfigutation class to introduce new host level parameters. HostParams (see HttpClient preference architecture for details <http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/3.0/preference-api.html>) should probably be sufficient Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
