With hindsight I should have asked this question last year. Why
exactly are you waiting for a release of 3.0 to goto SLP level? Some
marketing reason?

If it's in terms of finding resource to handle the move, then the
revent move of JCS has shown me that it's quite simple. It doesn't all
have to happen at the same time (Jetspeed still live in Jakarta's CVS
is an example there) and amounts to:

* Request mailing list change. Scripted now and seems to be quite simple.
* Moving the site at Jakarta, and adding a redirect.
* Promotng HttpClient on the main Jakarta site.
* An svn move.
* Potential wiki stuff.

I'm completely happy to help with most of this and am wondering why we
don't just go ahead and move HttpClient up (pretty sure it got the
vote many months ago).

Hen 

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:25:07 +0100, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Henri,
> 
> Things are gradually progressing (without much publicity, though)
> 
> We have been quite busy working on the high level component architecture
> for Jakarta HttpClient, which we are planning to hold a formal voting
> upon quite soon:
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-httpclient/HttpClientApiRedesign
> 
> This document present a fairly good overview of how we envisage
> HttpClient's evolution from what it is today, a monolithic client-side
> library, into a toolset of loosely coupled components suitable for
> client, proxy and server side development.
> 
> Technically speaking HttpClient 3.0 has not been released yet. We have
> just got the first release candidate out the door, and it may take a few
> more months and a few more RCs before the final 3.0 release.
> 
> So, we have not been sitting idle. We have been just keeping a low
> profile.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Oleg
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 00:32 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > With so many parts of Jakarta moving around this quarter, I'm trying
> > to keep a better eye on where things are.
> >
> > Last I recall, HttpClient was waiting on the now-released 3.0 version
> > before moving to a sub-project level project (secondary level project,
> > whatever, I just like SLP as an acronym). Is the move now underway at
> > all?
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to