DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34909>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34909 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-16 16:31 ------- (In reply to comment #3) Oleg, I think this may be the same problem in the HTTP Client 3.0 code. I overlooked this before, but I checked the 'response' strings in the logs I posted for both the 2.0.2 and 3.0 client and they do NOT match--just like in your initial test case where different responses were generated. I tried the patch too, just in case--no luck though. I seem to remember when I was stepping through the code for the 3.0 client that the cnonce value (which I believe is seeded with the system time), is hashed into the final 'response' value---I do not know if the 2.0.2 code does this, but it may be why the 3.0 code is producing a different response. > Jeff, > I was wrong in my initial assumption, because my test case was flawed. The > invalid auth response generated by HttpClient 3.0 was due to a deprecated > constructor I used in my test cases. > > So, this does not look good. I may need a set of valid credentials for the > site > in order to proceed. > > Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
