DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35815>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35815 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-22 10:12 ------- Klaus, Certainly HttpClient won't make pipelined requests all by itself. The MTCM does it's best to avoid this, actually. How did you obtain the "snoop"? Can we be sure that the two requests were made over the very SAME TCP connection? Or could they have ended up in the snoop like this just by coincidence? Maybe you can patch the wirelog to include a connection id. Or just use Ethereal to obtain the snoop (select 'follow tcp stream'). Unfortunately the log does not contain the part where the connections are obtained. There should be a line stating "enter HttpConnectionManager.getConnection(HostConfiguration, long)". Can you obtain the rest of the log? Ortwin -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
