Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Folks, There are three issues that I think we need to discuss: (1) I inquired with the Jakarta PMC regarding the possibility of the project name change (Jakarta HttpClient -> Jakarta Http). The reaction was overwhelming negative, primarily due to high likelihood of branding conflict with Apache HTTPD, which is a very valid point. We have several options here: (1.1) leave Jakarta and join another TLP (either Apache Tomcat or Apache HTTPD) where _might_ be permitted to call the project jHTTP or some such sort (1.2) stay with Jakarta and try to come up with a radically different project name (1.3) essentially do nothing and keep the same name. In this case we are likely to not be permitted to release any lightweight HTTP server or proxy under Jakarta name
I'd rather stay with Jakarta for the moment just to keep administrative tasks down. We can always move later if necessary. I mean our users do not give a f*** where the project is located.
(2) Migration to JIRA. This finally can happen and happen very soon. The question is if we still want it. If yes, might have to decide on the project name before the migration takes place
I must say I prefer Bugzilla. If there is no need to move to Jira I wouldn't mind to stay with Bugzilla.
(3) 3.0 release. 3.0rc3 have not had any major bugs reported for quite some time. Do we want to release another RC4 before the final release or not?
Uhm, there was this little bug files yesterday: 36339. I'd go for another RC4 as we have fixed quite some bugs since RC3.
Odi -- [web] http://www.odi.ch/ [blog] http://www.odi.ch/weblog/ [pgp] key 0x81CF3416 finger print F2B1 B21F F056 D53E 5D79 A5AF 02BE 70F5 81CF 3416 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
