On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:56:30AM +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > > * Rename HttpAsync to HttpNIO. In my opinion NIO (as in non-blocking > > I/O) should be more descriptive and recognizable to an average Java folk > > than async. > > I just deleted a paragraph of this mail I had already written. When I > read NIO, I immediately associated it with the java.nio classes. The > HttpAsync design does not rely on java.nio classes, and I'm afraid this > renaming would lead users to believe that it does. It sure confused me. > > cheers, > Roland >
Hi Roland Now I am utterly confused as well. I thought the http-asynch per definition required a non-blocking HTTP stack? Am I missing something? If so, we just keep the http-nio as a separate module and leave http-synch be as it is Oleg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
