On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:54:29AM +0000, sebb wrote: > I had a quick look at the code in FindBugs, but have not had time to > look at the findings in much detail. There did seem to be a few > potential synchronisation issues, as well as some things like new > String(String). > > If you think it would be useful, I can try and find time to redo the > analyis and post the results (to Bugzilla)? >
Sure. Potential synchronisation issues is a serious matter, which we certainly would look at. Please do so Oleg > S. > On 23/11/05, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:38:06PM +0100, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > > In an attempt to get this poll going, here's my vote > > > > [x] 3.0 is stable. Release 3.0 final in November > > > > Oleg > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > Do you think HttpClient 3.0 is stable enough for the final release? > > > > > > Should we cut the 3.0 final sometime this month, should we wait another > > > while and release in December or should we consider cutting yet another > > > RC before the final release? > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > [ ] 3.0 is stable. Release 3.0 final in November > > > [ ] Do more tests and release 3.0 final in December > > > [ ] Release RC5 before final > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
