On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:33:50AM +0100, Ortwin Gl?ck wrote: > Oleg, > > All right. I am glad you are not doing this unconciously. It will be > interesting to see benchmark results. My guess is that you should not > see a significant performance gain (I expect less than 5%). The modern > GC algorithms in the Sun VMs are very good for short-lived Objects. To > see a difference you probably have to run HttpClient with multiple > threads under a high load for a long time, so that enough garbage is > produced and the GC actually has to run. The number of CPUs will have an > effect as well. > > Odi >
Odi, I am planning to write a report on the code refactoring I have done in the past two weeks. Anyways, those changes were not made completely out of the blue. However, I do admit some of them can be seen as controversial. Give me some time to write it all up and and let us talk things over Oleg > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > >Odi, > > > >I am aware this is a questionable decision. The primary motivating > >factor was to implement zero (or almost zero) garbage HTTP request > >parsing and see if that results in any significant performance gains. > > > >I have run a few tests yesterday and so far the impact of reduced > >generation of intermediate objects when parsing HTTP requests seems > >minimal for JRE 1.5. So, I am fully prepared to revert this change if > >there are no tangble performance gains for older JREs. I would like > >to experiment a little further before such a decision is made > > > >Oleg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
