DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37799>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37799 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-07 14:19 ------- Sorry, I'm a little late to this one. I would agree with Roland that I don't think this change is necessary. The existing code worked correctly. It's only downside is that it may cause some delay as the shutdown thread will have to wait if run() is currently executing. The current patch also introduces a bug: inside run() this.wait(pause) is called without owning the monitor. My preference would be to leave the code as is and just add this.notifyAll() inside of shutdown(). Mike -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
