DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37939>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37939 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-18 14:27 ------- Created an attachment (id=17238) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17238&action=view) Patch (HEAD method handling) Roland, I looked at various options to solve the HEAD method problem. At the moment I see only one alternative to passing the method name (or a reference to the original request object) as a parameter to the HttpClientConnection#receiveResponse(). All I can think of is post-processing HEAD method responses with a response interceptor in the HTTP request executor. The drawback of this solution is the that HttpClientConnection#receiveResponse() per default will always generate an HttpEntity instance for HEAD requests, even though this clearly does not make sense. Please review the patch and let me know what you think Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
