DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37976>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37976 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-21 06:18 ------- The question which I think needs to be answered is whether separate PostXML and PostSOAP examples are desirable. I could change PostSOAP to support both sets of functionality using an optional parameter, e.g. -soapaction <soapaction>. If the soapaction argument is missing it would behave the same as PostXML. The example would have a little bit more logic which isn't necessarily a good thing for an example but it would remove the duplication of code between the two files (as there would then only be one). If people prefer we could keep the name PostXML even though it supported SOAP as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
