Thanks for the quick response. RFC 1867 stats the following which leads me to believe that while it is not mandatory that Content-Length be present it is optional and recommended. Perhaps I am missing something?
"The HTTP protocol may require a content-length for the overall transmission. Even if it were not to do so, HTTP clients are encouraged to supply content-length for overall file input so that a busy server could detect if the proposed file data is too large to be processed reasonably and just return an error code and close the connection without waiting to process all of the incoming data. Some current implementations of CGI require a content-length in all POST transactions." On 1/18/06, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because the Content-Length header is not required by the MIME spec > > Hope this explains it > > Oleg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
