Hi Oleg, > I seriously doubt browsers can resolve relative links,
They have to, that's specified by HTML: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#h-6.4 http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#h-12.1.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#resolving-relative-uris I've been using relative links in local HTML pages for quite a while. They work as expected, whether I access the pages via file:/// from Windows, via file:/// from Linux, or via an HTTP server. > I rephrased this section a little, please let me know if you like it > better Yepp, better. I am still wondering whether the complaints about the libraries, in particular commons-logging, came from people who had a lot of other libraries to integrate, or rather from people who had few other libraries and didn't like to have to learn how to integrate anything at all. I would have expected that a lot of dependencies gives them integration practice, so that another library or two don't matter much. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
