On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 17:16 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > > HttpAsync (as well as HttpNIO) represents a completely new code line so > > far untested in the real life applications. I believe the first release > > version should be 1.0 not 4.0 reflecting this fact. > > > > What do you think? > > I thought about that for a second or two, then chose the same version > number as for HttpCore. Mainly because that's what my employer is doing > with it's products :-) I thought it would be less confusing for users to > combine the "4.0" versions of all HttpComponents. But we'll have > dependencies on minor versions anyway, so maybe it won't be that much > of a difference. > > I guess the ultimate question will be how we're going to present the > whole range of HttpComponents to the user. I've refrained from asking > that question so far, because I see other priorities for the time being.
To me it all boils down to a simple question whether we want to ship a full bundle comprised of all HttpComponent modules (httpcomponents-full.jar) and if so how we are going to version it. Otherwise, the versioning scheme of individual modules does not seem like a big deal. Oleg > > I have no problem with labelling HttpAsync 1.0. > > cheers, > Roland > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
